Erratum: A remarkable recurrent nova in M31: Discovery and optical/UV observations of the predicted 2014 eruption (Astronomy and Astrophysics (2015) 580 (A45) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526027)

M. J. Darnley; M. Henze; I. A. Steele; M. F. Bode; V. A.R.M. Ribeiro; P. Rodríguez-Gil; A. W. Shafter; S. C. Williams; D. Baer; I. Hachisu; M. Hernanz; K. Hornoch; R. Hounsell; M. Kato; S. Kiyota; H. Kučáková; H. Maehara; J. U. Ness; A. S. Piascik; G. Sala; I. Skillen; R. J. Smith; M. Wolf

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526027e

Erratum: A remarkable recurrent nova in M31: Discovery and optical/UV observations of the predicted 2014 eruption (Astronomy and Astrophysics (2015) 580 (A45) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526027)

M. J. Darnley
, M. Henze
, I. A. Steele
, M. F. Bode
, V. A.R.M. Ribeiro
, P. Rodríguez-Gil
, A. W. Shafter
, S. C. Williams
, D. Baer
, I. Hachisu
, M. Hernanz
, K. Hornoch
, R. Hounsell
, M. Kato
, S. Kiyota
, H. Kučáková
, H. Maehara
, J. U. Ness
, A. S. Piascik
, G. Sala

I. Skillen, R. J. Smith, M. Wolf

Physics & Astronomy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An error has been identified in Table 3 of Darnley et al. (2015). The original table of fluxes included the incorrect unit (×10^-15Wm^-2). The correct unit should have been (×10^-15erg cm^-2s^-1), and hence a discrepancy of a factor of 1000 was introduced. No other parts of the paper, nor the results reported within, were a ected by this error.We have included a corrected version in Table 1. (Table Presented).

Original language	English
Article number	C3
Journal	Astronomy and Astrophysics
Volume	593
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526027e
Publication status	Published - Sept 1 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Astronomy and Astrophysics
Space and Planetary Science

Access to Document

10.1051/0004-6361/201526027e

Cite this

Darnley, M. J., Henze, M., Steele, I. A., Bode, M. F., Ribeiro, V. A. R. M., Rodríguez-Gil, P., Shafter, A. W., Williams, S. C., Baer, D., Hachisu, I., Hernanz, M., Hornoch, K., Hounsell, R., Kato, M., Kiyota, S., Kučáková, H., Maehara, H., Ness, J. U., Piascik, A. S., ... Wolf, M. (2016). Erratum: A remarkable recurrent nova in M31: Discovery and optical/UV observations of the predicted 2014 eruption (Astronomy and Astrophysics (2015) 580 (A45) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526027). Astronomy and Astrophysics, 593, Article C3. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526027e

@article{6375e74832b1426d8fb29097f8fda11b,

title = "Erratum: A remarkable recurrent nova in M31: Discovery and optical/UV observations of the predicted 2014 eruption (Astronomy and Astrophysics (2015) 580 (A45) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526027)",

abstract = "An error has been identified in Table 3 of Darnley et al. (2015). The original table of fluxes included the incorrect unit ({\texttimes}10-15Wm-2). The correct unit should have been ({\texttimes}10-15erg cm-2s-1), and hence a discrepancy of a factor of 1000 was introduced. No other parts of the paper, nor the results reported within, were a ected by this error.We have included a corrected version in Table 1. (Table Presented).",

author = "Darnley, \{M. J.\} and M. Henze and Steele, \{I. A.\} and Bode, \{M. F.\} and Ribeiro, \{V. A.R.M.\} and P. Rodr{\'i}guez-Gil and Shafter, \{A. W.\} and Williams, \{S. C.\} and D. Baer and I. Hachisu and M. Hernanz and K. Hornoch and R. Hounsell and M. Kato and S. Kiyota and H. Ku{\v c}{\'a}kov{\'a} and H. Maehara and Ness, \{J. U.\} and Piascik, \{A. S.\} and G. Sala and I. Skillen and Smith, \{R. J.\} and M. Wolf",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 ESO.",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1051/0004-6361/201526027e",

language = "English",

volume = "593",

journal = "Astronomy and Astrophysics",

issn = "0004-6361",

publisher = "EDP Sciences",

}

Darnley, MJ, Henze, M, Steele, IA, Bode, MF, Ribeiro, VARM, Rodríguez-Gil, P, Shafter, AW, Williams, SC, Baer, D, Hachisu, I, Hernanz, M, Hornoch, K, Hounsell, R, Kato, M, Kiyota, S, Kučáková, H, Maehara, H, Ness, JU, Piascik, AS, Sala, G, Skillen, I, Smith, RJ & Wolf, M 2016, 'Erratum: A remarkable recurrent nova in M31: Discovery and optical/UV observations of the predicted 2014 eruption (Astronomy and Astrophysics (2015) 580 (A45) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526027)', Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 593, C3. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526027e

Erratum: A remarkable recurrent nova in M31: Discovery and optical/UV observations of the predicted 2014 eruption (Astronomy and Astrophysics (2015) 580 (A45) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526027). / Darnley, M. J.; Henze, M.; Steele, I. A. et al.
In: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 593, C3, 01.09.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - A remarkable recurrent nova in M31: Discovery and optical/UV observations of the predicted 2014 eruption (Astronomy and Astrophysics (2015) 580 (A45) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526027)

AU - Darnley, M. J.

AU - Henze, M.

AU - Steele, I. A.

AU - Bode, M. F.

AU - Ribeiro, V. A.R.M.

AU - Rodríguez-Gil, P.

AU - Shafter, A. W.

AU - Williams, S. C.

AU - Baer, D.

AU - Hachisu, I.

AU - Hernanz, M.

AU - Hornoch, K.

AU - Hounsell, R.

AU - Kato, M.

AU - Kiyota, S.

AU - Kučáková, H.

AU - Maehara, H.

AU - Ness, J. U.

AU - Piascik, A. S.

AU - Sala, G.

AU - Skillen, I.

AU - Smith, R. J.

AU - Wolf, M.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - An error has been identified in Table 3 of Darnley et al. (2015). The original table of fluxes included the incorrect unit (×10-15Wm-2). The correct unit should have been (×10-15erg cm-2s-1), and hence a discrepancy of a factor of 1000 was introduced. No other parts of the paper, nor the results reported within, were a ected by this error.We have included a corrected version in Table 1. (Table Presented).

AB - An error has been identified in Table 3 of Darnley et al. (2015). The original table of fluxes included the incorrect unit (×10-15Wm-2). The correct unit should have been (×10-15erg cm-2s-1), and hence a discrepancy of a factor of 1000 was introduced. No other parts of the paper, nor the results reported within, were a ected by this error.We have included a corrected version in Table 1. (Table Presented).

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84986626919

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84986626919#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1051/0004-6361/201526027e

DO - 10.1051/0004-6361/201526027e

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84986626919

SN - 0004-6361

VL - 593

JO - Astronomy and Astrophysics

JF - Astronomy and Astrophysics

M1 - C3

ER -

Erratum: A remarkable recurrent nova in M31: Discovery and optical/UV observations of the predicted 2014 eruption (Astronomy and Astrophysics (2015) 580 (A45) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526027)

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this